Actually, Sammie didn't get a job. I'll talk about that in a
minute.
The topic in class was: Boys and Girls. Based on a news
article whose headline screamed: it is more difficult to be a girl in America
than in Kazakhstan, I wanted my students, most of whom are girls, to reflect on
whether it was more difficult to be male or female in China, and on what they
could do about it.
To make my case, I delved into the NBC piece, which stated
the organization Save The Children conducted a poll on the quality of life for
girls all over the world. China was notably absent from the report. I made sure
to point that out.
I also pointed out that boys's lives were apparently not
worth a report.
And then, the twist: the female students should research and
report on life as a boy and the male students should research and report on
life as a girl: how is life easier? How is life harder? How can we even out
gender responsibilities and privileges? I told my rapt audience that, in order
to prepare for their assignment, they should visit that organization's
websites:
They should also interview people of the opposite sex: family members, classmates, boyfriends or
girlfriends. That way, they could get a good picture of how life is, on the
other side of gender barrier:
The week before, we had talked about racial discrimination,
following a viewing of the movie Freedom Writers. The kids were apalled at
what-all that movie alludes to, especially the racism. Because of their
interest, I decided to explore their feelings and expand the topic to include
gender bias. The boys being girls and vice versa, for the purpose of this
exercise, was my way of getting them to discover how life is for the other
gender. Perhaps girls would stop being so demanding of their men? Maybe men
would be more supportive of their women?
I was eager for the next week's classes, when I would hear
what they'd discovered. A lot of what they said was banal; I suspect about half
the kids only went with their thoughts/ideas, without interviewing anybody. A
few made up whole speeches from lines of the song: If I Were a Boy, by Byonce.
Maybe they thought I don't know that song?
A few blew me away with their depth of thought. August got
the straight dope from his mother: life is not easy at all for a woman, no
matter how good looking she is, or how rich her husband. Quite a few girls
expressed sympathy for males, who are called on to be the family provider. Many
of them disdained the cultural norm of men having to have a house, car and cash
before they can think of marriage.
On that one, I urged my female students to be true partners
with their men. Why shouldn't they
contribute equally to their home and bank account?
And then, there was Sammie: a shy, soft-spoken girl with
radiant skin and wise eyes. Her turn at the podium revealed a loathing of
lordly men, withholding or dispensing to women at will. She hated being at the
mercy of males! I was quite taken aback by her seething report and vowed to
talk with her privately about her feelings. Surely she must have been
grievously injured to feel this way!
No need for private conversation. We soon learned why this
shy girl was enraged to the point that she would speak so vehemently in front
of the whole class. She had applied for a job the past weekend and gotten
turned down: “I'm not going to hire you. You're a girl.”
No, not turned down: humiliated.
I know that feeling of impotent rage she felt; I've been
there. I too have been denied work because of my gender, when I was not much
older than she is now. And, like her, I had no idea how to assert myself.
China has laws against gender discrimination. It doesn't
stop employers from practicing bias, but it does give the likes of Sammie a leg
to stand on... if they dare. There seems to be a cavalier attitude towards
women who complain of gender discrimination, and that attitude is well-known. Many
women simply accept rejection (humiliation) and hope the next time, it won't
feel so slimy.
I don't want that for Sammie, or any other female, in China
or elsewhere.
Fortunately, more and more women in China are coming forth
with outrageous stories of bias against them. The teacher who was fired for
being pregnant – her contract specified against marriage or motherhood. The
young woman who responded to a 'males only' job ad (yes, those still exist in
China!), only to be rebuffed as not anatomically correct for the position:
administrative assistant at a language school. Hers was China's first gender
employment discrimination discrimination case. She won.
Her case was arbitrated a mere 2 years ago. She adopted a
pseudonym during the proceedings to protect herself from possible negative
fallout. Those facts, in themselves, make a statement. Don't you think?
As does the report from Save the Children. I keep coming
back to the question: why only girls? I couldn't find a report on boys: does
this organization believe that boys do not have any issues? Does Save the
Children not consider boys' issues? Are boys' needs less urgent? Unimportant?
You might think that, as a female who has endured discrimination, I would be
overjoyed that girls are in the forefront. I'm not. I tend to believe that a
biased focus, in itself, causes and perpetuates bias.
In China, there are now advocacy groups in Beijing, Shanghai
and elsewhere to attend to and help enforce women's rights in the workplace.
Changes are coming slowly, but they are coming. Recently, an ad specifying only
male applicants would be considered was removed, thanks to the diligence of
those groups.
Thanks to them, and to the slow-dawning realization that
women are equally valuable employees, Sammie and, in the future, her daughter might never have to endure the
humiliation of being turned down for a job simply because they were born
female.
I can hope, can't I?
No comments:
Post a Comment