The event was
anticlimactic. And grueling.
The first day, Friday, we
saddled up full of pep and energy, leaving the school at 8:30. On the bus we
discussed strategy, opening lines and speculated on how things might be. I met
our Chinese debate team then, too.
Competition guidelines
stated that, for every 2 English teams each school sends, one Chinese team must
also debate. Of course, the guidelines also stated that each school could send
as many English debaters as were qualified. With our 4 English teams, we were
within the guidelines grooming 3 Chinese teams. Having been mandated to cut our
English team in half, we now had more Chinese debaters than English ones.
What I mean by ‘English’
and ‘Chinese’ debaters refers to the language they would speak in competition.
Of course, all the students are Chinese, as are all of the coaches, except for
me. The teams I coached were to debate in English and the other teams would
compete in their native tongue.
After much excitement and
a pleasant, formal welcome by the competition organizers at a hotel in front of
the campus the contest would take place at, we all made our way to the Language
Arts building, on top of a hill, toward the back of campus.
This institute’s
architecture was reminiscent of Greek schools: soaring facades, Doric columns,
gabled entryways and all. In fact, the setting reminded me of the Acropolis.
The school borders a lake and the various ‘colleges’ – buildings dedicated to
teaching an entire major’s curriculum were built in concert with the hilly
terrain. Even the dorms featured scalloped friezes around the windows. For all
of the architecture and the cultivated grounds, for the pleasant breeze coming
off the lake, and even for the teaching buildings’ appearance of austere
academia, I couldn’t get away from the fact that all the buildings were
concrete, just like every other building in Wuhan. Just goes to show: no matter
how dressy the frontage, fundamentally, all is the same.
Another thing all the
same: the crowding. Intellectually I am used to the lack of personal space, or,
should I say the outright disregard for personal space. But, because I tend to
go out in small groups and avoid crowds whenever possible, the unpleasant idea
of being herded came to mind. Hard to step away from the masses when you are
surrounded. Nevertheless, being pressed into from all sides was not a shock.
After nearly 4 years of living in China, I can take this type of thing in
stride.
What was shocking was the
lack of organization. I honestly can’t tell you what I expected or anticipated,
but I can guarantee you the event did not come close to what we imagined.
We had to enroll our
teams ten days before the event took place. One would think that, will all the
teams registered, the matches could be set in advance. However, that first day,
nothing was set.
Initially, coaches were
to undergo training on how to judge at the same time as the contestants trained on how to debate. Just
as we arrived at the room where training was to take place we were told judges’
training was canceled. What to do with the rest of the morning?
We ambled around. One of
our coaches, Tibby, had just graduated from that university. She gave us a
guided tour. At 11:30 we were treated to lunch provided by the hosting campus.
Again we were surprised. Instead of the school’s cafeteria providing lunch it
was catered in. We each got a take out container of rice, and another of
vegetables and meat. It was a bit spicy but tasty, and welcome. The morning’s
exertions had made us all hungry.
At lunchtime is when our
school’s contestants met up again. I have to admit: I was a bit uncomfortable
about being separated from the team I coached. My idea of being at the
competition with them was to offer moral support, to let them know we were in
this together, till the end. Instead, I judged 4 different face-offs, not one
of them consisting of any of my teams. I’ll get into that a little later.
During lunch we chattered about the morning’s experiences. All of us kept our
disappointment at bay, expounding only on the interesting parts.
After lunch everyone
reconvened in the English Salon, an auditorium type of room, to get our
assignments and see the list of pairings. Unfortunately the room was not large
enough to accommodate everyone, so the coaches/judges were sent to a classroom,
which proved too small for us all. A further division: English team judges were
to repair to yet another classroom while the Chinese team judges would stay
put.
Now the grumbling was
audible. The day was getting late and tempers were fraying. Decorum flitted
away. Claws were unsheathed and maws gaped. I even spotted a few fangs.
However, no venom was spilled and we coaches/judges sat around for another
hour, waiting for something… A
directive. Or… SOMETHING!!!
At 3PM all coaches/judges
were told they should go to the large room below the English Salon for
training. Again, the room was too small and Chinese judges had to go to another
room. At 4PM the trainer, who freely peppered her lesson with profanity told us
we were to go back to English Salon to prepare for Round 0 debates.
Now it is 5PM. We have
been waiting for an hour. Still no matches set, no assignments. The dismay
intensifies. Now, at 5:30, we’re hoping nothing more will happen today. We were
supposed to be done by 6PM. Word had it that, if nothing was settled or started
soon that we would all go home.
So much for that word.
Round 0 debates started at 6:20. We did not get home until 9PM.
The next morning, bright
and early. 8:30 we board the bus, by 9AM we are back on Grecian Campus. This
time things seem to go relatively smoothly. We still had to sit around, waiting
for assignments. However, with Round 0 under our belts we now knew what to
expect. In fact, due to my experience judging Round 0 I was looking forward to
judging again. Judging Round 1 was not a pleasant experience. The two women I
judged with did exactly what we were told NOT to do in training: judge based on
whether we agree with a contestant’s arguments. We were supposed to judge based
on eloquence, number of points brought up and whether that debater fulfilled
his/her role. I was out-voted and a contestant that did not merit accolades was
given first place.
From then on, it became a
bloodbath. Contestants’ claiming they were unfairly judged was the chief
complaint. From my perspective, that complaint had merit, but such allegations
slowed the seeding process even more, so that we only judged 3 debate rounds
instead of the intended 4. However, we did get home on time that night. Thank
goodness!
I had coached my team
according to World University Debate Competition rules, which specify that the
first minute of speaking should afford the contestant time for introduction,
and summarizing his/her position in one sentence. After which should follow 5
minutes of talking: bringing up points of information pertinent to the issue,
and backing them up. During the final minute, the speaker should summarize
his/her argument, and be back in his/her seat by the time the 7 minute bell
tolls. Each speaker has these 7 minutes and keeping time is crucial.
Bri and Celine caught up
with me after the first debate round to tell me the judges said their
introductions were pointless, and in fact they had lost points because of it. I
approached one of the competition organizers with this problem. She stated that
I must be far more qualified than all other coaches to have trained my team to
that standard. She advised me… nothing. So I advised my team that, prior to
debating they should approach the judges and tell them they were trained to
introduce themselves. If the judge deemed that unsatisfactory, they should
rethink their opening minute to conform with the norm.
Late in the day I was
accosted by a team of fierce debaters I had judged, who were angry they were
only second place. They could not believe that timing was crucial, and that
they lost points because one of the speakers only spoke for 4 minutes. It was
my pleasure to direct them to the Rules website I had consulted. Somewhat
mollified but still fuming, they strode away.
Come Sunday night we were
all wrung. On the bus, going home, silence prevailed. Until Sam spoke up.
It seems our debaters had
earned some prize money! The English team came in third tier and the Chinese
team second tier. Not too shabby for a bunch of kids who only had minimal time
to prepare. Sam gave each contestant 50Yuan, and promised them their
certificates of participation as soon as they were scanned into the school’s
database.
They glowed!! They knew
they were getting certificate but had no idea there was prize money involved.
Even that surprise was not enough to rouse them from their stupor, but their
smiles indicated their joy. These are truly kids to be proud of. And I am.
Your skill at writing, including the detail to shape the image for the imagination has bee taking shape over the years. Not necessarily your years in China either. In my experience as a reader, the amount of detail you provide to the reader is nearly equal to Stephen King. (though not his subject matter)
ReplyDeleteI have chosen to peruse rather than to read in detail, unless the article's meat is in those details. Your audience is knowledgeable for that attribute. In this, I ask for a private audience. Bobby