One of the first things that struck me as soon as I touched
foot on American soil is that people in America visibly proclaim their status.
Most notable was a family of what appeared to be of the
fundamental religious sort. The women wore home made dresses topped by
pinafores, with bonnets on their head. The family’s girls wore similar garb but
did not wear the head coverings. None of the women wore any type of adornment:
makeup, jewelry… not so much as a wedding ring. Their shoes were plain, the
type that is commonly referred to as ‘old lady shoes’.
The men were more conventionally attired: shirts and slacks,
and a variety of footwear ranging from athletic to loafers. Also, it seems they
were allowed more flamboyance: they wore wedding rings and watches, and they
sported different lengths of hair although none wore theirs excessively long.
This group grabbed my attention but was by no means the only
group visibly displaying their status. Women who are Muslim wore their burqa,
women who are Indian were wrapped in their sari. In these cases too their men
were more conventionally dressed – conventional to western culture, that is.
Slacks, button down shirts and loafers or sneakers, with a modicum of jewelry.
Looking further: businessmen proclaim their status by
wearing suits and pulling expensive travel cases. Prior military, or even
current military usually wear or carry something camouflage: a duffel bag,
combat boots or, if active duty, wear a complete uniform. People from the South
wear tee-shirts with Dixie oriented slogans and blue jeans. Some wore cowboy
hats.
And so on. I conclude that, in America, people of special
interest groups display their interest visibly, almost as a challenge. Consider
people who are homosexual (rainbow banners/stickers on their car), people
affiliated with the Marine Corps (USMC or Semper Fi stickers on their car),
people who are Mexican, people’s political affiliation (bumper sticker for
their current candidate, this being an election year), people who enjoy and
support gun ownership with their NRA shirts, stickers or pins, people who
‘heart’ dogs or cats or books or…
All of this proclamation is very strange to someone who has
lived in China for the past 11 months.
The Chinese do their best to not stand out in any way. They
even have a word for that phenomenon: he (pronounced ‘hre’). In its purest
sense, ‘he’ means ‘with’ or ‘and’, as in ‘you and me’ – ‘ni he wo’.
Since the dawning of Chinese society several thousand years
ago people were encouraged to hold their head down, work for the collective good
and not proclaim any kind of status lest they be ‘made an example of’. This
held true during the feudal times as well as during the early years of the
Communist party. It is such an ingrained part of being Chinese that it still
goes on today.
One obvious exemption: nuns and monks. They have the… right?
Obligation? to display their status by wearing robes representing their status
and religion. However, it bears noting that, from circa 1950 until the 1980’s,
when Deng Xiaoping realized the cultural significance of the country’s founding
philosophies, being a monk or a nun was a dangerous occupation.
The only other exception to the ‘keep your head down’ rule
was fingernails and skin, and that, to an extent, was beyond a person’s ability
to control. Only the emperor and his concubines, people who did no manual labor
whatsoever, and even went so far as to have eunuchs to dress and groom and feed
them wore their fingernails long. The longer the nails, the longer that person’s
hands have been unused, indicating that person has been a part of imperial
court.
Dark skinned people were obviously those who toiled outdoors
while fair skinned people could afford the luxury of shade of some sort. Maybe
they were officials or bureaucrats who spent the days indoors. To this day fair
skinned Chinese, especially women are more desirable than dark skinned Chinese.
Nowadays in China you might recognize a businessman because
he is carrying a murse (a man’s bag), and by the type of cigarette he smokes.
The way he holds his cigarette is also indicative of his status. Although he
might sport jewelry of some kind, it is unobtrusive. He does not wear a suit or
bear any other distinctive ‘marking’. He is just as likely to ride a bus as he
is to rent a car or own one outright. In general, whether male or female you
cannot tell a bureaucrat from a salesclerk, a student from an office worker or
a waiter from a shop keeper.
Service uniforms – police, military, railroad or bus and
even street sweepers are in no way distinctive from male to female, other than
females have the option of wearing skirts. The shirts and slacks are not
tailored to accommodate gender.
You could say the Chinese are masters of assimilation.
That is changing nowadays, though. With conspicuous
consumerism becoming the norm, flaunting your status and wealth has changed the
‘keep your head down and your thoughts close’ mentality. Clothing, accessories
such as shoes, bags and jewelry, hygiene and grooming all quietly but
emphatically advertise status. Electronics proclaim your wealth. Obviously if
you own an I-Phone you are ‘better’ than someone who owns a run of the mill
Samsung. Where you live and how your apartment is outfitted, what you serve for
dinner and what you do for entertainment all underscore your place within this
rapidly evolving, class craving society.
People are judged by what type of car they own (if they own
one). When word got out that Victor bought a car last year he was the envy of
all the teachers till they found out he bought a small Chevy Aero. Had he
bought any type of Toyota but especially a Camry he would have proclaimed
status. As it is, with his practical
but by no means luxurious conveyance he is actually a laughingstock on campus.
Poor Victor! And here he thought he had stepped up on the esteem ladder!
The Chinese have a long way to go to meet or beat the
American passion of proclamation. I daresay that, in some ways they will never
go beyond the level of status declaration they currently display. A lot of that
has to do with the lack of religious and political freedom they have, as well
as the suspicion the government has regarding fringe groups.
Besides, it is very hard to throw off thousands of years of
cultural tradition.
Very interesting and well thought out.
ReplyDelete